Member Login

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Sign Up!

Commissioners Approve Amendment to Increase Setbacks to a half mile for Wind Farms

May 6, 2013


 05/07/13 It was a full-house for Monday’s County Commissioner’s meeting.  The crowd was on hand to hear the commissioner’s decision on the original amendments presented to them by the Plan Commission concerning the Wind Energy Conversion System Ordinance.

Late last month the County Plan Commission rejected the commissioner’s recommendation to revise the amendment and just ban commercial wind farms in the county.  The commissioners felt like the Plan Commission was increasing the setbacks from 1,000 feet to a half mile (2,640) and adding additional restrictions as a way of blocking the huge towering machines from the landscape.  The Plan Commission rejected their recommendation and sailed a revised ordinance amendment back to the commissioners. 

  Prior to Monday’s discussion Dennis Thorton from the Bremen area was on the agenda and spoke.  He’s a prior president of the plan commission and chaired the first wind energy conversion system committee.  He presented documentation comparing of population density where there is a major difference.  He also presented information on issues in Tipton County and problems that have developed with their wind farm.  Thorton showed pictures and a video of wind turbines on fire and spinning out of control and breaking up with a debris field over a half mile. 

  With little discussion the County Commissioners unanimously approved on all three reading  the amendments requiring a half-mile set back from churches, schools, public parks, and rivers. 

Although the amendments were approved the Commissioner will conduct a public hearing at their next meeting on May 20th for a proposed ordinance that would ban commercial wind farms in Marshall County. 


One Response to “ Commissioners Approve Amendment to Increase Setbacks to a half mile for Wind Farms ”

  1. Thor on May 7, 2013 at 4:56 am

    Is the setback only applicable to public areas? Are private property owners protected too? If not then they do need to ban the wind farms all together.

    Why would it be okay to have my house and family in the fragmentation pattern of one of these cyclopean pinwheels while eating dinner at home but they could feel safe on a public property or while boating down a river?

    Why would a bbq at the park be protected but not a bbq in my back yard?

    Most of the health concerns from these things come from living by them, not visiting them occasionally. Were the set backs from private property just left out of the article? If not, this is just one hand clapping.